Policy Statement on Educating Hard of Hearing Children in
Regular Schools
SHHH views the sense of hearing as a human birthright, one that should be valued and
exploited as fully as possible regardless of what system a person employs as a primary
communication mode. By definition, hard of hearing children possess usable residual
hearing and, with appropriate auditory management, are capable of employing audition
as their primary channel for perceiving and developing an auditory-based language system.
Because of this capability, their educational needs will differ from children who are
educationally or functionally deaf, those whose primary communication mode is visually based.
Because both groups of children have impaired hearing, it has been, and still is,
common practice to routinely combine deaf and hard of hearing children within the same
classes, offering all of them the same basic educational program and requiring all of
them to communicate primarily through a visual mode. There is a major problem with this
practice, conceptually and practically.
From a conceptual point of view, hard of hearing children generally have much more in
common with normally hearing children than they do with deaf children. Like normally hearing
children, hard of hearing children developed their auditory-verbal skills
(however aberrant) primarily through audition. Deaf children, on the other hand, acquired
their communication skills primarily through the visual channel. By combining both groups
in a single educational setting, and exposing both to similar educational practices, the
effect is a de-emphasis of the auditory potential of hard of hearing children. In this
group, we include children who are the recipients of cochlear implants who have the
capability to function as hard of hearing, given an appropriate auditory-based therapeutic
and educational program.
The major practical implication in making this distinction is that for hard of hearing
children education can proceed most efficiently through the "ear" (which then carries over
to reading, given the heavy dependence of English orthography on the sounds of the language),
while for deaf children, education must be primarily visually-based. Certainly, both groups
of children deserve the best kind of education we can provide them. However, educating hard
of hearing children with and like deaf children results in a heavy emphasis on the visual
channel, in conflict with their need to have audition and oral communication emphasized
throughout the entire educational process. The use and emphasis of audition can best be
accomplished in a regular educational setting, where hard of hearing children cannot only
benefit from the conversational models provided by their normally hearing classmates, but
where they are also exposed to the same high academic expectations as their classmates.
It is the position of SHHH that most hard of hearing children can, and should be, educated
in regular, as opposed to special, educational settings. We emphasize "most", since
educational decisions should be made, for any child in any group, on the basis of the
individual child's needs and not by some categorical, often arbitrary, grouping imposed upon
a child. We do know that all hard of hearing children require appropriate auditory management.
This would encompass any step taken to ensure maximum use of their residual hearing, such as
the careful selection and supervision of various kinds of amplification devices (hearing aids,
personal and FM sound-field systems, etc.) and the optimization of the acoustical
environment in the classroom. This latter requirement is particularly important for hard of
hearing children since it would assist them in hearing the questions and comments made by their
hearing classmates. Other supplemental services such as speech/language therapy and
academic tutoring must be provided when required. Given appropriate support services - and
these should be written into a child's individual educational plan (IEP) - the vast majority
of hard of hearing children are fully capable of performing at grade level while fitting in
psychosocially with their normally hearing peers. In other words, placement in a regular
classroom should be considered as the first option for a hard of hearing child, to be modified
only as necessitated by specific circumstances (i.e. parental preferences, the child's
performance, etc.).
Hearing Loss, Nov.- Dec., 1997
Send Comments to Webmaster